2009 VW Passat (What Happened?)

[thegman1234]

Originally Posted by callisto9

I didn't like it when they changed the design in 2006 - the Passats are looking like every other car out there. I say "meh".

I see where you're coming from, and I agree. It's at the point where every car does look alike. The only ones that really stand out are of course the Beetle, and cars that are extraordinarily ugly such as the PT Cruiser (sorry PT fans) and the Element (although the Element is mostly about function and not form). Unfortunately though, if Volkswagen doesn't keep up with the times, they can't compete, and if they can't compete it's bad for us (VW drivers).

So as much as enthusiast don't like when cars are so radically redesigned (you can't possibly imagine what they said about the 2006 3-series over on the BMW forums), it's really to our benefit in many ways.

However, one thing I find with VW is they're not overstyling. I can't honestly say in my opinion that I think they've gone too far on any of their current or previous cars.

[dnyed]

Today, I got to sit in, touch and fondle a 2009 CC Passat. I nearly fainted at the beauty.

I need to buy more lottery tickets.

[dnyed]

Originally Posted by callisto9

I didn't like it when they changed the design in 2006 - the Passats are looking like every other car out there. I say "meh".

Oh, the humanity!

Now, go wash out your fingers with soap, dearie!

[callisto9]

I hate to say it, but I'm a Beetle fan, not a VW fan. I've never really cared for the other models. Well, maybe the pre-2006 Jettas. And GTIs. The older stuff is kinda cool, but 2006 and after, bleh. Sorry. I'm a Beetle girl!

[raff]

Originally Posted by dnyed

Today, I got to sit in, touch and fondle a 2009 CC Passat. I nearly fainted at the beauty.

I need to buy more lottery tickets.

I'd almost buy it for the black/camel color seats; very color-concept like.

[Alco251]

One problem I had was that you barely tell the difference between a Passat and a JettaV, so the marketing guys decided it would be better if the $40K car looked different than the $20K car.

[pdoel]

Originally Posted by Alco251

One problem I had was that you barely tell the difference between a Passat and a JettaV, so the marketing guys decided it would be better if the $40K car looked different than the $20K car.

Really? I have no trouble seeing the difference between the two. Some minor similarities, but most car companies are like that.

Just think of the A4, A6 and A8. Kinda look like bigger versions of each other. Most companies using styling queues throughout their lineup.

[silverspeedbuggy]

Originally Posted by Alco251

One problem I had was that you barely tell the difference between a Passat and a JettaV, so the marketing guys decided it would be better if the $40K car looked different than the $20K car.

But the CC starts at $27K, not $40K

[SMG]

The CC is a really great looking car. The tails are a bit weird but the evil front-end more than makes up for it.

[TechnoTrix'd]

Originally Posted by mrchaotica

This is how a four-door sedan is supposed to look! Embrace the squareness!

Unfortunately, that look got old quick. Friend has the Daytona packaged Dodge version of the 300. It's a beast (tons of power and it can pull straight up to 130mph on the track), just old looking now.

Great start, but like all American car companies as of the last 15 years, its a once and done design with no follow-though or updating. (e.g. PT crusier, 300/Charger/Nomad wanabe, Dodge Ram trucks, pick any Malibu design, etc..)

[TechnoTrix'd]

Originally Posted by Alco251

One problem I had was that you barely tell the difference between a Passat and a JettaV, so the marketing guys decided it would be better if the $40K car looked different than the $20K car.

Actually the base CC starts at 26k. Same trim levels as the passat (sport, LUX, VR6). It appears they are only $1,500 off in price points, the CC being more expensive than the Passat. Also, only the VR6 AWD version tops the 40K limit.

[dnyed]

The one I fondled was $47K!

[Deserion]

Originally Posted by dnyed

The one I fondled was $47K!

Probably had every single feature on it (plus markup), too. A loaded Passat CC VR6 4Motion (configured through vw.com) with every option and add-on accessory only hits $43,210.

[dnyed]

Yes, VR6, and 4Motion, and markup. It was a beauty!

[silverspeedbuggy]

They're marking these thing up? That's crazy! It's my understanding that the changes made to the CC cost very little and since they are more expensive than a Passat, dealers are already making more profit on each of these cars than a similarly priced Passat.

[dnyed]

Well, Hannah VW always marks up.

[TechnoTrix'd]

Originally Posted by Deserion

Probably had every single feature on it (plus markup), too. A loaded Passat CC VR6 4Motion (configured through vw.com) with every option and add-on accessory only hits $43,210.

Which is still crazy money, BUT if you compare it to similar styled cars (Benz, Lexus), it is 30 - 40 thousand less.

Again, it is a styling "thing" and if you like the sleek lines and the upgraded interior, this is a great car for the dollars.

Not to mention the preformance aspect, stronger tuned engine (280 ponies in the VR6) and better suspensions.

I am seriously thinking of swapping my '08 Passat for a similar optioned CC right now. It will depend on the dollars, and if it's close, a CC will be in my driveway very soon.

[BUGSTUFF]

Mmmm, Zesty!!!

[Chaz1138]

Very sexy car ...

[Severecaraddict]

I just spec'd one out for $42,725. That's VERY comparable to BMW's 5-series and the Mercedes E320. I'd never pay that for a new VW, but in another year when the market is a little more saturated, you'll be able to pick up the same car for around $30k. VW resale isn't the best in the word, and that's a double-edge sword.

I love the look of the CC, but I'll have to see it in person and drive it before I'd make a decision. I didn't see an option for a manual transmission and that's just a damn shame!