Manual transmission? - NewBeetle.org Forums
NewBeetle.org Forums
Go Back   NewBeetle.org Home > NewBeetle.org Forums > Discussion - Technical > Transmission Talk

Transmission Talk Discussion area for transmission and related issues and concerns.

NewBeetle.org is the premier Volkswagen Beetle Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 01:04 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Default Manual transmission?

Having seen a lot of complaints about NB AT transmission, I am wondering whether its manual transmission also has the similar problem or not? Or its manual transmission is much more reliable than its AT counterpart?

I am going to buy a New Beetle, either 2007 model or 2010 model, one is with manual shift; the other is AT. Has anyone
had no problem with AT after 2007 year model?

Is manual shift always more reliable than AT?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 01:25 PM
Smileybug's Avatar
5/23/10 <3
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Cary, NC, USA
Car: 1999 Techno Blue GL 2.0 5-speed (RIP), 1984 Jetta GL TD, 2003 20th GTI
Default

Manuals rarely have issues. The only big (which when compared to problems with the autos is not big at all) is needing to replace the clutch. But that can go for 150k+. The autos fail a lot. Its not so much if, its when.

Not so sure on the new transmissions. I'd stick with a manual myself though. Much less to go wrong and much cheaper to fix and replace.
__________________
The Baby: Darla, 102k, '99 New Beetle GL 5-speed. Bone stock. Acquired 4/6/05. Gave her life for me 8/17/11. RIP
The Project: Klaus, 180k+, '84 Jetta GL Turbo Diesel. Rebuilt and bringing 50+ mpg. Slightly improved from stock Acquired 7/12/08
The Baby Brother: Günther, 20th Anniversary Edition GTI
The money saver:2001 Jetta TDI GL. 114k. Dead auto, swapped to 3 pedals. Hubby's DD and our trip car
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 01:38 PM
kcfoxie's Avatar
I'm not a girl. Sorry!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Durham, NC, USA
Car: 2003 New Beetle TDI
Default

In every measure, from every make, the manual is going to outlast the automatic. Even in a Mercedes, which probably have the longest lasting automatics on the planet.
__________________
Phoenix: 2003 Uni-Red New Beetle GLS TDI 140k former-automatic with a 1998 TDI Manual Transmission swap.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 01:57 PM
Smileybug's Avatar
5/23/10 <3
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Cary, NC, USA
Car: 1999 Techno Blue GL 2.0 5-speed (RIP), 1984 Jetta GL TD, 2003 20th GTI
Default

Don't think you can say that...the new Mustangs have some serious trans issues, keeping them from being able to shift and from what I've read, the dealer can't seem to fix it. Its an inherent problem with the transmission itself (a Chinese unit...need I say more?). I've actually seen people on TCL say that they wish they would have stayed away from the manual on those cars...and anymore, the autos are getting more efficient than a manual as they turn more to DSG.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:13 PM
kcfoxie's Avatar
I'm not a girl. Sorry!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Durham, NC, USA
Car: 2003 New Beetle TDI
Default

Ok, so there are some exceptions (Ford used German transmissions in the Focus).
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:52 PM
MyOtherRidesAVette's Avatar
Member Sponsor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location:
Houston, TX, USA
Car: '05 Vert "Dark Flint Limited Edition"
Default

Have to agree with SB, Foxie, you can't generalize like that. GM automatics, at least the tried and true ones that have been used for decades, go hundreds of thousands of miles with absolutely no service, no leaks, no slips, no top-offs, nothing. And I tow with most of my vehicles. Millions of miles ago I had to have the bands adjusted on a '71 Cutlass Vert, I restored. As to performance, some ATs will out perform MTs. Back in the day, Pontiac Racing Division, used the 3spd Hydromatic coupled to their 389 HOs and 421s, in their race cars, and Buick had a killer 2spd Dynaflow coupled to their 426 nailheads. I was a big street racer and drove both.

And regarding the later DSG (02E) trannies in the late model NBs, I don't remember reading any threads indicating any issues. If you check the EPA fuel economy specs for the NBs, you'll also find the ATs get slightly better fuel economy with highway driving.

M.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 03:45 PM
SMG's Avatar
SMGNewBeetle.org Member Sponsor SMG is offline
Buy a SALEEN BUG T-Shirt!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Car: 2000 Cyber Green 1.8T, 2001 Vortex Blue TDI
Default

The DSG's are way better. The older 4-speed automatics aren't worth the trouble though.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 05:54 PM
kcfoxie's Avatar
I'm not a girl. Sorry!
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Durham, NC, USA
Car: 2003 New Beetle TDI
Default

Sure, if we're talking about a 2006 or later and automatic Beetle (what the poster asked about) isn't so bad.

My mom had about 5 automatic GM or Ford cars that I can recall (the Turino being the most craptastic of them all), my dad had a rule about buying used cars with under 150k miles. All of them had transmission failures, it got to where every year or two my dad just bought another clunker.

Meanwhile in 1989 my grandfather bought a brand new Black-over-red Dakota Sport. 244k later, the clutch went out. He traded it for a 2001 Colorado manual, in 2011.

Dad's Golf had never had a clutch replaced till he did it, because we knew the first and second owners (met the first via the second who was our neighbor). This car had an easy 400k on it since the odometer stopped at 260k and the guy we got it from drove from Memphis to Asheville twice a week for work for a year (that's 1000+ miles a week). When the clutch went he sold it to my dad for $500, we're still driving that car.

And if that's not enough, the upkeep in fluid alone for an automatic vs a manual is considerable. It takes 2QT of fluid at about $40 in a manual VW gearbox. The automatic takes more like 4.2QT or just over a gallon of fluid. Even if it costs the same, more volume means more cost. There is also the filter to replace. And the interval; a DSG needs its fluid ($129, 6.3QT of fluid) changed every 40,000 miles for optimal performance. The manual transmission has its gear oil replaced every 100,000 miles. For the cost of a single DSG change, I can afford to change the fluid on 3 manual transmission cars totaling 300k of service for the single 40k service of a DSG.

But, in the end, it's about how long you intend to keep it / how old it is if you're buying it and how hard you drive it. All these high miler autos and manuals are driven gently.

But until I see more 250k mi flywheel didn't grenade my transmission DSGs, I'm still saying, get the manual transmission.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-20-2011, 06:10 PM
VDubYah's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location:
Orlando, FL,
Car: 2002 GLX, 2003 GLX 1.8 2008 SE
Default

Get what you really want. If you want an AT good.If you want a manual good. try to remember what kind of driving you are going to do, lots of stop and go can get old with a manual.

An automatic with fluid changes (not flushes)( alright let the flames begin. We've had the flush vs change debate before on the forum)can be a good long lasting trans.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2011, 12:41 AM
Cooky's Avatar
Every one calls me Fuzzy
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location:
Loudon, TN, USA
Car: 1998 VW New Beetle and 2000 Jeep Wrangler
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smileybug View Post
Manuals rarely have issues. The only big (which when compared to problems with the autos is not big at all) is needing to replace the clutch. But that can go for 150k+. The autos fail a lot. Its not so much if, its when.

Not so sure on the new transmissions. I'd stick with a manual myself though. Much less to go wrong and much cheaper to fix and replace.
I would go with the manual and I just had to replace my trans due to the dif breaking apart on me (it still drove if the wheels were straight ) and the reason of the dif going bad was my fault. I had 2 tires with drasticly different amounts of tread. Though I drove it probly 30 miles after it went bad. As far as the cluch goes I had 192k on my and the guy that was helping me ( who worked for VW for 10 plus years ) said that everything look factory and still had 50+ % on it. As far as I know it was never replaced. The people I bought him from was related to the first owner ( I am the first owner out if the family) said it had never been replaced. ) I would not have worried to drive another 80k to 100k+ before I replaced it. But it also depends on how you drive.

Sent from my DROID X2 using AutoGuide App
__________________
2k12 TOD
Camping At the Top 2k12
"slow is smooth, smooth is fast"
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Manual transmission fluid Smileybug Transmission Talk 18 06-04-2011 01:15 PM
Manual Transmission Won't Go Into Reverse - Help! Jon Lloyd Transmission Talk 8 05-22-2011 02:21 PM
Manual Transmission cataldo279 Suggestion Box 1 08-29-2009 03:29 PM
Manual Transmission Problems!! JoDiazz Questions, Issues, Concerns, or Problems with the New Beetle 4 09-10-2008 09:35 PM
Redline MTL or MT-90 for Manual Transmission? [lot] Transmission Talk 3 08-14-2008 04:13 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2